Elim: The Desert Oasis
After the episode at Marah, where the bitter springs were turned into drinkable water, Moses and the Israelites traveled to a place named Elim. It is described as having 70 palms (trees) and 12 wells, a fitting coincidence allowing one well for each of the 12 tribes of Israel.
According to Exodus 15:27 and Numbers 33:9-10, the Israelites come to Elim and camp “near the waters,” presumably referring to the Red Sea. Therefore, Elim should be near where the Israelites arrived after crossing the Red Sea, but to the north or south so they'd still be by the Red Sea. Elim must also be to the west of a mountainous area referred to as the "Wilderness of Sin," which the Israelites pass through on their way to Mount Sinai.
In The Antiquites of the Jews, Josephus describes Elim:
And now removing from thence they came to Elim; which
place looked well at a distance, for there was a grove of palm-trees; but when they came near to it, it appeared to be a bad place, for the palm-trees were no more than seventy; and they were ill-grown and creeping trees, by the want of water, for the country about was all parched, and no moisture sufficient to water them, and make them hopeful and useful, was derived to them from the fountains, which were in number twelve: they were rather a few moist places than springs, which
not breaking out of the ground, nor running over, could not sufficiently water the trees. And when they dug into the sand, they met with no water; and if they took a few drops of it into their hands, they found it to be useless, on account of its mud. The trees were too weak to bear fruit, for want of being sufficiently cherished and enlivened by the water.
Both Josephus' and the Biblical description indicates it is a small area, as it only had 70 palms and 12 wells, with adequate campgroundsadjacent to the spot. The Hebrew root word of “Elim” (alternativelyspelled “Elyim”) is “Eloth” or “Elath,” meaning a small group of trees,or a grove.
If Saudi Arabia’s Jabal Maqla mountain is Mount Sinai, then this would mean that Elim is located near the northwestern coast of SaudiArabia bordering the Gulf of Aqaba. The famous 1st century historianJosephus wrote that Elim could still be located during his time. Heconfirmed the existence of trees and wells at the location.
Possible Site in Saudi Arabia: Tayyib al Ism
About 6 miles from the Gulf of Aqaba, there is a small city within a valley named Tayyib Al Ism. It is widely referred to as the "Wells of Moses" and "Waters of Moses" by local Saudis. When our researchers visited the area, a couple of Saudis explicitly confirmed it as Elim when asked. Saudis from the eastern side of the country were visiting the area to see where they believed Moses walked.
Below we have two maps detailing where we believe Elim was located.
The possible crossing point from Egypt’s Nuweiba Beach into Saudi Arabia would have brought the Israelites into wadis (valleys) formed in a north-south direction. This possible match for Elim is located close to where three wadis meet; two north-south wadis and one east-west wadi. The topography explains why the Israelites would have walked in the direction described in Exodus.
There is a collection of dozens of palm trees and, to this day, 12 wells, which are now reinforced with concrete. Proponents of this site as Elim argue that the 70 palms would have increased in number over time.
If this is the correct location, then the Israelites traveled southwards from the Red Sea Crossing landing point using the north/south valley. Upon intersecting with the east-west valley, they'd reach Elim, drink from the 12 wells and camp nearby to the west by the waters within the east-west valley.
A short distance southeast of Tayyib Al Ism is the town of Magna on the coast of the Gulf of Aqaba. There are reportedly a dozen wells at this location, as well as a collection of palm trees. Indeed, on Google Maps, there is a marker for the "12 Springs of the Prophet Moses."
19th-century English geographer and Biblical critic Charles Beke identified the Caves of Jethro near Magna as Elim. In a letter to the editor of the London Times, dated January 28th, 1874, Beke wrote:
"This most interesting spot, which requires to be more closely examined, is especially important to me, because I now see that here, at Madian, and not at Ayunah (Aynunah), must have been the ' Encampment by the Red Sea,' of the Israelites. Its proximity (half a day's journey) to Maghara Sho'eib, or Jethro's Cave, which I identify with the Elim of the Exodus, and the fact that the stream of running water must have some of its sources at or near that spot, explain why it should not have been mentioned in Exodus, XV. 27, xvi. i, as a separate station, much more satisfactorily than I attempted, in page 38 of my pamphlet, Mount Sinai a Volcano, to explain the apparent discrepancy in the two statements of Scripture. The 'Encampment by the Red Sea,' was simply a continuation of that at Elim, with its ' twelve wells of water and three score and ten palm trees,' the two together stretching down the valley, with its living water, from Maghara Sho'eib, or 'Jethro's Cave' to this ' Praying-place of Moses,' at Madian.
When we traveled to this site, and to the caves of Jethro, we did not see 12 wells and palms at the site of the caves. However, in future trips, we plan to further examine the area as we work to more definitively identify which site may be Elim.
Another proposed site is just north of the Gulf of Aqaba, near the modern Israeli city of Eilat. Rabbi Alexander Hool, in his book Searching for Sinai: The Location of Revelation, claims that the journey from Marah, which he claims was the Great Bitter Lake, took seven days across about 270 kilometers.
In chapter thirteen of the book, he claims that the prefixes of many sites in this area indicate that Elim was here: Eilat, Eil Paran, and Eilot. He also mentions that since shortly after Elim the Israelites camp by the Red Sea, that it must be a short distance away.
We disagree with Rabbi Hool's identification for Elim because such a long distance between Marah an Elim does not align with the rest of the documentation of the Exodus account. Each campsite from Egypt to Mount Sinai was carefully documented by the author of the book of Exodus and Numbers. If the journey between Marah and Elim took seven days as Hool proposes, why are no other campsites noted?
The Israelites greatly slowed down their travels after they crossed the Red Sea. The implicit assumption that there was no documented campsite between Marah and Elim, if separated by 270 km, does not fit with the rest of the narrative.
Last updated June 25, 2019.